hits counter Leibniz: Philosophical Essays (Hackett Classics) - Ebook PDF Online
Hot Best Seller

Leibniz: Philosophical Essays (Hackett Classics)

Availability: Ready to download

Although Leibniz's writing forms an enormous corpus, no single work stands as a canonical expression of his whole philosophy. In addition, the wide range of Leibniz's work--letters, published papers, and fragments on a variety of philosophical, religious, mathematical, and scientific questions over a fifty-year period--heightens the challenge of preparing an edition of his Although Leibniz's writing forms an enormous corpus, no single work stands as a canonical expression of his whole philosophy. In addition, the wide range of Leibniz's work--letters, published papers, and fragments on a variety of philosophical, religious, mathematical, and scientific questions over a fifty-year period--heightens the challenge of preparing an edition of his writings in English translation from the French and Latin.


Compare

Although Leibniz's writing forms an enormous corpus, no single work stands as a canonical expression of his whole philosophy. In addition, the wide range of Leibniz's work--letters, published papers, and fragments on a variety of philosophical, religious, mathematical, and scientific questions over a fifty-year period--heightens the challenge of preparing an edition of his Although Leibniz's writing forms an enormous corpus, no single work stands as a canonical expression of his whole philosophy. In addition, the wide range of Leibniz's work--letters, published papers, and fragments on a variety of philosophical, religious, mathematical, and scientific questions over a fifty-year period--heightens the challenge of preparing an edition of his writings in English translation from the French and Latin.

40 review for Leibniz: Philosophical Essays (Hackett Classics)

  1. 5 out of 5

    Ella Grace

    What an interesting read! Because of our modern day knowledge of atoms and because nothing works perfectly, I don't think his concept of monads would work but it was interesting to think about that perhaps these perfect monads worked before the Fall and atoms are part of a new broken world. Also, I found his discussion on the connection between mind and body interesting since it was quite different from Socrates' teachings. What an interesting read! Because of our modern day knowledge of atoms and because nothing works perfectly, I don't think his concept of monads would work but it was interesting to think about that perhaps these perfect monads worked before the Fall and atoms are part of a new broken world. Also, I found his discussion on the connection between mind and body interesting since it was quite different from Socrates' teachings.

  2. 5 out of 5

    Roberto Rigolin F Lopes

    We are somewhere between 1660 and 1715, Leibniz is exchanging letters with friends about recent developments on the state-of-the-art. Sometimes sharing his criticism over other people ideas (say Descartes, Lock and Newton) and other times replying to criticism on his ideas. He very often uses “god” in his arguments; Kindle says that there are 986 appearances of “god” in this text, about two “gods” per page! And his “god” is indeed formidable but fiction (even a priest wrote him saying that his i We are somewhere between 1660 and 1715, Leibniz is exchanging letters with friends about recent developments on the state-of-the-art. Sometimes sharing his criticism over other people ideas (say Descartes, Lock and Newton) and other times replying to criticism on his ideas. He very often uses “god” in his arguments; Kindle says that there are 986 appearances of “god” in this text, about two “gods” per page! And his “god” is indeed formidable but fiction (even a priest wrote him saying that his ideas are hard to reconcile with free will). If you want to play Nietzsche (THE god-challenger), you can challenge Leibniz’s god just using the BIG BANG (1927) + EVOLUTION (1859). But, hey, this is a pretty easy win sitting on more than three centuries of scientific developments (I am writing this blah in 2018). So showing some respect to his mathematics, you can replace his “god” by three types as follows. A-god = nature. B-god = “I have no idea!” (he should shout this instead of creating a perfect god). C-god = NONSENSE (the creator of souls, angels, miracles and so on). B and C-gods are all over this book, but if you are up to a challenge, GO. I need his math/physics after this struggle.

  3. 5 out of 5

    jaime tobar

  4. 5 out of 5

    Locussolus

  5. 4 out of 5

    Cole Simmons

  6. 5 out of 5

    Hazel

  7. 5 out of 5

    Buck

  8. 5 out of 5

    Jim

  9. 4 out of 5

    Thomas Pon

  10. 5 out of 5

    Nathan Cox

  11. 4 out of 5

    Luke

  12. 4 out of 5

    Ryan Healey

  13. 4 out of 5

    chris keller

  14. 4 out of 5

    Eli

  15. 4 out of 5

    John Schroeder

  16. 5 out of 5

    Larisa Blinova

  17. 5 out of 5

    J

  18. 5 out of 5

    Irving

  19. 4 out of 5

    Thai Divone

  20. 4 out of 5

    Michael Lloyd-Billington

  21. 5 out of 5

    Veronica

  22. 4 out of 5

    Spectraz

  23. 5 out of 5

    Alexi Parizeau

  24. 5 out of 5

    Max

  25. 5 out of 5

    Billy Candelaria

  26. 4 out of 5

    Sean Namei

  27. 5 out of 5

    Dimitris

  28. 4 out of 5

    Randy

  29. 5 out of 5

    Blake

  30. 5 out of 5

    Atte

  31. 4 out of 5

    jeffrey

  32. 4 out of 5

    Robert

  33. 4 out of 5

    Kale

  34. 5 out of 5

    Greg Gauthier

  35. 5 out of 5

    Nathan Rubene dos Santos

  36. 4 out of 5

    Matt Sawyer

  37. 4 out of 5

    Arman

  38. 5 out of 5

    Amy VanHym

  39. 4 out of 5

    Jenny Bâûr

  40. 4 out of 5

    Zhang

Add a review

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Loading...
We use cookies to give you the best online experience. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our cookie policy.